Baseball Writers Make Bad Calls (Why Greg Maddux was the easiest Unanimous Hall of Fame Inductee of my Generation)



Today Los Angeles Dodgers Baseball writer Ken Gurnick made it known that he would not be voting for Greg Maddux’s induction into the Hall of Fame (Sixteen others did the same). Ken selected only one person for Cooperstown, Jack Morris. Jack Morris is an all-star pitcher, five times over. He Ranks 43rd all time for wins (245) and had an ERA of 3.90. He also had three 20+ win seasons. Jack Morris is not Greg Maddux.
By comparison Maddux was an eight-time all-star had 355 career wins (eighth all time). Maddux was a Cy Young award winner in 1992, 1993, 1994, and 1995. Twice the Cy Young vote was unanimous.

Morris was never a Cy Young winner. My intent is not to compare these two pitchers. It is obvious that Greg Maddux is a first ballot Hall of Fame inductee. I don’t even want to discuss Jack Morris’ potential place in Cooperstown. I want to express my absolute frustration that writers like Ken Gurnick have the opportunity cast a vote that will forever enshrine an individual in baseball history and they pass.
Major League Baseball establishes which players are eligible to be elected to the Hall of Fame. From those eligible a voter may choose a minimum of one and up to ten players to be selected. It’s very simple. Pick the best. If there are ten players in your opinion who should be in the Hall of Fame, vote for ten. If there is only one player, vote for that player. If a player receives a votes from 75% or greater he gets to make a speech in upstate New York.
I am tired of entitled elitist baseball writers deciding that the Hall of Fame voting should be anything other than the greatest eligible players. Hall of Fame voters have a very simple decision. Vote for the best, up to ten if you want. Yet time and time again baseball writers have failed miserably to do the one thing that should be an absolute no brainer. There have been players that without question are unanimous Hall of Fame inductees. If you go back to those voters and ask them if the truly great ones should be in Cooperstown they would say absolutely.
Here are just some examples of whom I believe are, without any dispute, first ballot, unanimous, please, please allow us to use your likeness on HOF memorabilia inductees.


Nolan Ryan 5714 strikeouts 7 no hitters, 61 shutouts 2 time MVP: 98.8% voted him into the Hall of Fame (in the writers’ defense he was the highest percentage ever).


Ricky Henderson 1406 stolen bases (all time leader), 2295 runs (all time leader), and 297 homeruns: 94.8% of voters approved.


Sandy Koufax 12 year career 165 wins 87 losses an ERA of 2.76 1963 NL MVP, three time unanimous Cy Young Winner, 86.87% said he was good enough to share a place with Jim Rice and Barry Larkin.


Then there’s my favorite. It took him four times to get enshrined in Cooperstown. In fact his first eligible year he received only one vote (.4% of total votes, which by today’s standard, 5% is required for any future consideration to be placed on the ballot) In thirteen years he had 361 homeruns, 2214 hits, a .325 batting average was a thirteen time All-Star (his entire career if your keeping score at home) he was a three time AL MVP, won batting titles back to back in 1939 and 1940 and played on nine World Series Championship teams. Joe DiMaggio was voted in with 88.8% of the voters deciding he was good enough for the Hall of Fame.  It just breaks my heart.

Why do they do it? Is it a sense of entitlement? Is it because they are trying to help a guy get in? Is it because they feel the player’s career was marred with scandal?

Whatever the reason I hope that some day a sports writer like Ken Gurnick will be asked by his grandson, “Grandpa were able to see Greg Maddux play?” and Ken would say “I sure did. He was the best of my generation, a four time Cy Young winner.” “Did you vote him into the Hall of Fame Grandpa?” “No I did not. I voted for Jack Morris.” “So you only had one vote?” “No I had ten votes, I just voted for Jack Morris.”

If I am ever given the responsibility to decide the recipients this award I will follow one simple rule, “Who are the ten best out there?” If you are one of the ten, you deserve to be in. If your eligibility runs out before you make that list, I am sorry. Even Don Mattingly, my favorite player, may not get an invite. But those who are tasked with this very honored responsibility don’t disrespect the players and the game of baseball with your agenda. Greg Maddux should have been a unanimous vote. In five years I hope that we won’t see this happen with the greatest closer baseball has ever seen. Mariano Rivera is unanimous; I just hope the baseball writers make the right call.


1 comment: